Resources · Royalty & money
How franchise royalty is structured in India
The four structures Indian franchisors actually use, what each does to unit economics, and the definitional choices that decide whether your royalty is collectable without an argument every month.
Read by a professional adviser on 21 August 2026. It is still general information rather than advice on your situation, and rates, thresholds and rules change after a review — check anything you intend to rely on against the source.
Most royalty disputes are not about the rate. A franchisee who agreed to 5% rarely comes back to argue for 4%. They come back to argue about what the 5% was charged on — and that argument is won or lost in the agreement, months before the first invoice.
This guide covers the four structures Indian franchise networks use, what each does to the franchisee’s economics, and the definitional choices that decide whether your royalty is collectable quietly or renegotiated every quarter.
The four structures
Percentage of sales
The default, and the one most franchisees expect. Royalty is a percentage of the outlet’s sales for the period — commonly in the range of 3% to 8% for food and retail formats in India, though it varies widely by category and by how much the brand supplies.
It aligns the two sides: the brand earns more when the outlet does well. It also transfers risk to the brand, because a bad month for the outlet is a bad month for head office.
The whole structure rests on one word — sales — which is the subject of the next section.
Fixed periodic fee
A flat amount per month or quarter, regardless of performance. Predictable for both sides, simple to invoice, and immune to sales-reporting arguments because it does not depend on reported sales at all.
The cost is alignment. A fixed fee is heaviest exactly when the outlet is struggling, which is when a franchisee is most likely to stop paying and most likely to blame the brand. It suits formats with stable, predictable throughput, and service formats where “sales” is genuinely hard to define.
Tiered or slab rates
The percentage changes with volume — for example 6% up to ₹10 lakh of monthly sales, 5% above it. Slabs can reward growth (the rate falls as sales rise) or protect the brand’s floor (the rate rises after a threshold).
Slabs are where arithmetic errors live. Two decisions have to be explicit in the agreement:
- Marginal or flat? Does the lower rate apply only to sales above the threshold, or to the whole period’s sales once the threshold is crossed? These produce very different invoices.
- What resets, and when? A slab that resets monthly behaves differently from one measured on a rolling twelve months, particularly for seasonal formats.
Minimum guarantee
A percentage of sales, subject to a floor: the greater of X% of sales or ₹Y per month. Common where the brand has invested in territory exclusivity and needs the unit to be worth holding.
A minimum guarantee is a real obligation on a franchisee who is not yet trading well, and it is the structure most likely to end in a renegotiation or an exit. If you use one, be deliberate about whether it applies from opening day or after a ramp-up period — a floor that bites during fit-out delays creates a dispute in the outlet’s first quarter, which is the worst possible time.
The definition that decides everything: “net sales”
Percentage royalty is charged on a defined base, and in India that definition has to survive GST. Write it out in the agreement rather than assuming a shared understanding.
| Question | Why it matters |
|---|---|
| Gross or net of GST? | Charging royalty on a GST-inclusive figure means charging royalty on tax the franchisee collected for the government. Almost every agreement intends net of GST — say so. |
| Discounts and offers | If the brand mandates a promotion, is royalty on the menu price or the discounted price? Franchisees notice this one immediately. |
| Aggregator sales | Delivery platforms deduct commission before settlement. Is royalty on the gross order value or the net settlement? Both are defensible; only one can be in the agreement. |
| Refunds and cancellations | Sales that were reversed should not carry royalty. State whether they are netted in the same period or the next. |
| Non-core revenue | Merchandise, third-party products, franchise-fee recoveries — in or out? |
A definition that answers those five questions is worth more than a percentage point of rate.
What the franchisee is actually paying
Royalty is not the only recurring cost, and a franchisee evaluating your brand adds them up. Set against a typical unit’s monthly sales, the recurring charges usually include:
- Royalty on the defined base
- An advertising or brand-fund contribution, often 1–3% of sales, usually a separate ledger
- Software, supply-chain margin or mandated purchases, depending on the format
- GST on the invoiced amounts
If total recurring charges take a share of revenue that the format’s margin cannot support, the result is not a franchisee who pays reluctantly — it is a franchisee who under-reports sales. Bad royalty design does not produce disputes so much as it produces unreliable numbers.
Making it collectable
Three things separate royalty that arrives from royalty that has to be chased.
Show the working. A franchisee who receives a figure with no basis has only one way to question it: an argument. A statement that shows the sales basis, the rate applied, any adjustment and the tax treatment converts a dispute into a line item. This is the single highest-leverage change most networks can make.
Close the period on a schedule, not on a memory. Royalty computed whenever someone gets to it arrives at irregular intervals, and irregular invoices are paid irregularly. A fixed close date trains the relationship.
Keep adjustments visible and separate. When you credit a franchisee — a marketing contribution, a supply shortfall, a settlement — record it as its own entry against the run rather than by quietly changing the basis. The invoice stays correct, the settlement reflects reality, and the history explains itself a year later when nobody remembers the conversation.
Two structural traps
Netting before invoicing. GST is charged on the gross royalty even when what actually moves between the parties is a net figure after offsets. If your system nets first and then invoices, the document understates the taxable value and your CA will send it back. Invoice gross; settle net.
Assuming the franchisee’s payment equals your receivable. Franchisees deduct TDS before paying. A unit that pays 90% of an invoice has not underpaid if the balance went to the government on your behalf. A ledger that cannot model that produces a permanent list of fictional arrears — and once the ageing report is wrong, nobody uses it.
A short checklist before you sign the next agreement
- The royalty base is defined in writing, including GST, discounts, aggregators, refunds and non-core revenue.
- If slabs are used, marginal-versus-flat and the reset period are both stated.
- If there is a minimum guarantee, its start date relative to opening is explicit.
- The ad fund is a separate obligation with its own accounting, not folded into royalty.
- The statement the franchisee receives shows the basis, not just the total.
- Your system invoices gross and settles net, and expects TDS.
Sources
- Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the rules made under it
- Income-tax Act, 1961 — sections 194J and 194H